Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Combined effect of celecoxib and glucosamine sulfate on inflammatory factors and oxidative stress indicators in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Deng Gang, Chen Xiaguang, Yang Kanghua, Wu Aiping, Zeng Guangxuan

Department of Sports Medicine, People's Hospital of Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province 341000, China;

For correspondence:-  Zeng Guangxuan   Email: fe1293@163.com

Accepted: 28 January 2019        Published: 28 February 2019

Citation: Gang D, Xiaguang C, Kanghua Y, Aiping W, Guangxuan Z. Combined effect of celecoxib and glucosamine sulfate on inflammatory factors and oxidative stress indicators in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Trop J Pharm Res 2019; 18(2):397-402 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v18i2.25

© 2019 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the combined effect of celecoxib and glucosamine sulfate on inflammatory factors and oxidative stress indicators in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA).
Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to two groups of 60 patients each: control group and study group. The control group received celecoxib at a dose of 200 mg/kg/day, while the study group received glucosamine sulfate (500 mg/kg) in addition to celecoxib, thrice a day. Treatment in both groups lasted 8 weeks. The serum levels of tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), prostaglandin-2 (PGE2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) were assayed before and after treatment. Visual analogue scale (VAS), osteoarthritis index, Lysholm knee score scale (LKSS), and adverse reactions were also evaluated.
Results: After treatment, total effectiveness was significantly higher in the study group (91.33 %) than in control group (71.67 %, p < 0.05). Serum TNF-α, IL-1 and PGE2 were significantly lesser in the glucosamine sulfate-treated patients than in control group (p < 0.05). The activity of SOD was significantly higher in glucosamine sulfate-exposed patients than control patients (p < 0.05). On the other hand, VAS and WOMAC scores were markedly lower in patients given glucosamine sulfate than in control patients (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The combination of celecoxib with glucosamine sulfate effectively reduces immune inflammatory response, oxidative stress damage, and joint pain associated with KOA.

Keywords: Celecoxib, Glucosamine sulfate, Osteoarthritis, Inflammatory factors, Oxidative stress

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates